is a searchable international registry charting the growth of open access mandates and policies adopted by universities, research institutions and research funders that require or request their researchers to provide open access to their peer-reviewed research article output by depositing it in an open access repository.
Open Access (OA) generally refers to making scientific and scholarly knowledge and information freely accessible online. There is a global trend in providing open access to research and scholarly outputs, e.g. articles, conference papers, working papers, theses, etc.
There are two primary ways for delivering OA: OA Journals (or "Gold OA"), and OA Repositories (or "Green OA").
Green OA refers to self-archiving/depositing published or pre-publication works in aninstitutional repository, a disciplinary archive, or a personal website. Authors provide access to preprints or post-prints (with publisher permission) for free public use.
Gold OA refers to publishing works in open access journals. The works can be freely accessed via publisher's website, and sometimes an article processing charge (APC) is applied after the work has been accepted and published.
Easier, faster access and reuse Publications can be accessed for free. In terms of Gold OA route, where papers are published in OA journals, full-text of publications are available online shortly after they are accepted; in terms of Green OA route, a version of the full-text (e.g., post-print manuscript) can be made available in accordance to publisher's self-archiving policies before the publishers' version is published online. This allows easy access to researchers who do not have subscription to the journal you publish in.
Higher visibility and impact
Studies show that OA publications are cited more than non-OA publications (Swan, 2010; Wagner, 2014; Wang, 2015). In addition, making your works OA helps people from the industry, e.g. practitioners, policy-makers, to see your works without the subscription barrier.
In terms of Gold OA route, OA journals which publish electronically, can minimize the delay in bundling manuscripts into issues. Also, publishing in OA journals (especially pure OA journals) is considerably faster than publishing in traditional subscription-based journals. (Björk, 2013)
OA ensures project members from different universities and countries all have access to the same research outputs.
More and more funding agencies now require their grant recipients to comply with some level of OA policies. These include Research Grants Council (RGC) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), which are two major funders to PolyU researchers. Both RGC and NSFC require all of their funded or partially funded research to be made publicly available in an OA repository, if the publisher's version is not available in open access.
To support PolyU academic community in disseminating research results widely and freely, and also to comply with the OA mandates from various funding bodies, the Research Committee (RC) of PolyU considered and approved the following open access policy for implementation from the beginning of the 2010/11 academic year:
PolyU authors will provide to the University Library copies of their work and the University Library will determine publisher agreements permit deposit in institutional repositories for public access. PolyU Institutional Research Archive staff will check publishers' copyright agreements to ensure that the deposits are permitted.
RGC, operates under the aegis of the University Grants Committee (UGC), is responsible for the distribution of funding for academic research projects undertaken by academic staff of those UGC-funded institutions.
35. On public access of publications resulting from research funded by the RGC:
(a) Upon acceptance of a paper for publication, the PC (Project Coordinator) / PI (Principal Investigator) should check whether the publisher already allows (i) full open access to the publisher’s version, or (ii) the author’s depositing a copy of the paper (either the publisher’s version or the final accepted manuscript after peer-review) in the institutional repository for open access;
(b) if both (a) (i) and (ii) are not allowed, the PC / PI should request the publisher to allow him/her to place either version (preferably the publisher’s version, but failing that the final accepted version) in his / her institutional repository for restricted access immediately upon publication or after an embargo period of up to 12 months if required by the publisher; and
(c) subject to the publisher’s agreement on (a) or (b) above, the PC / PI should deposit a copy of the publication in his/her institutional repository as early as possible but no later than six months after publication or the embargo period, if any.
National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)
NSFC is responsible for directing, coordinating and making effective use of the national natural science fund to support basic and applied research in China. It is one of the major basic-science funding agencies in China.
From the day this policy statement is enacted (15 May 2014), research papers generated from projects fully or partially funded by NSFC, when submitted and published in academic journals, the authors of the papers should deposit the final manuscripts, which have been peer reviewed and accepted by the journals to the NSFC repository with an embargo period of no more than 12 months. Earlier OA should be provided if the publisher allows. If the paper is published in an open access journal or the publisher allows deposit of the published version in PDF format, such version should be deposited into the NSFC repository and the OA should be provided immediately.